|
"There, in front of
all those cameras and lights, Christian leaders lovingly,
winsomely and firmly took a stand," he said. "I
will never forget the picture. I stood between Archbishop Wuerl of
Washington and Cardinal Rigali, Archbishop of Philadelphia. I
looked over at Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council, Jim
Daly of Focus on the Family, and Ron Sider, president of
Evangelicals for Social Action. It was a foretaste of what we're
all going to see in heaven."
—Chuck Colson speaking on his
"BreakPoint" radio commentary of the Manhattan
Declaration press conference |
"Preach
the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort
with all longsuffering and doctrine." 2 Timothy 4:2
The release of the Manhattan
Declaration has sparked much controversy and conversation. The document
attacks the very biblical foundations of the Christian faith, including, in
practical application, the doctrine of justification. The evangelical
signers—my focus in this article are the ministers and leaders—can deny
that all they like and indulge in all the sophisms which many have. But
the truth is, the document declares that the gospel of the Roman Catholic
Church, which is also the gospel of her estranged sister the Orthodox
Church, is "the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ." The
Manhattan Declaration also states over and over that the signers are all
"Christians" and bears the false testimony that all the signers
are members of "the church." Further, as I wrote in a statement
our church released to the public and the press on November 23, it is
"shot through and through with popish error." Those familiar
with Romanist social doctrine, as well as her incessant affixing of the
term "gospel" to various social and moral causes, will pick up
on that without much trouble. I have spoken in depth on these things when
addressing the Manhattan Declaration in a sermon and on our "Heart of
the Matter" program—not that I could not think of more things to
address! The document is a veritable wellspring of error and deception,
obvious and subtle.
But what has motivated me to write a
few lines for those interested to read them are the responses to the
Manhattan Declaration from Christian leaders on "our side." What
I mean is that much of it seems so tepid, so lukewarm, so lacking in
evangelical fire, and utterly devoid of a call for repentance. After all,
the evangelical signers of the MD have yoked with false brethren, open
idolaters, even Roman Catholic archbishops, bishops, priests, and Orthodox
clergy in a brazen assault upon the blood and righteousness of Christ, as
well as the purity of the church which He "hath purchased with his
own blood" (Acts 20:28). In this, the MD evangelicals have not
only shown utter contempt for Christ, the gospel of grace, and the true
church; but they have also cruelly confirmed to Romanists and the
Orthodox everywhere that they are "children of God by faith in Christ
Jesus" and members of the "household of faith" when in
reality they are "without Christ . . . having no hope, and without
God in the world" (Eph. 2:12). And then, with their "good
words and fair speeches" (Rom. 16:18), the MD evangelicals have gone
on to defend what they have done, adding deceit to deceit. If this does
not qualify them as the sort of "grievous wolves" (Acts 20:29)
the Apostle Paul warned of—and by the way showed no quarter to—then what
does it take to qualify? When our Lord warned us of "ravening
wolves" wearing "sheep's clothing" (Mt. 17:15), He
taught us to discern them by "their fruit" (Mt. 7:16). The
Manhattan Declaration speaks for itself in that regard!
Now, when writing to the Galatians,
Paul rebuked those brethren calling them "foolish Galatians" and
demanding to know "who hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey
the truth, before whose eyes Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth,
crucified among you?" (Gal. 3:1). "Jesus Christ, and him
crucified" (1 Cor. 2:2) had been clearly set forth before the
Galatians by the faithful preaching of the gospel. And those whom the Lord
had saved by grace alone, through faith alone, in Christ Jesus alone had
received the earnest of the Spirit, who had powerfully manifested His
presence among them. But now the Galatians were accommodating,
fellowshipping with, and even giving audience to those Judaizing teachers
with their gospel of works, such of whom Paul declared, "Let him
be accursed" (Gal. 1:8-9).
I believe it is proper to state that
the Roman Catholic religion, with its "infallible Vicar of
Christ," its priestcraft and sacramental salvation, its open idolatry
and gross superstition, is even worse than that of the Judaizers! Yet the
professed evangelicals who signed the Manhattan Declaration have declared
to the whole world, and the unbelievers with whom they have yoked, that
the Romish gospel is "the Gospel of our Lord and Savior Jesus
Christ." It follows then, at the very minimum, to ask them, "Who
hath bewitched you, that ye should not obey the truth, before whose eyes
Jesus Christ hath been evidently set forth, crucified among you?"
But, as I just pointed out, those
MD evangelicals are doing even more than giving ear and fellowship to
false teachers. By leading the way in signing the document, they are
acting as false teachers justifying and teaching a false gospel. This
gives us pause to ask if they even have, by faith, seen "Jesus
Christ, and him crucified"? But they declare it to be so; they
protest that they hold to the free grace of God in the salvation of
sinners; they call themselves evangelicals; and most come from what are
considered to be at least "conservative" evangelical churches.
So then they ought to be held accountable as such, even as we urge them to
"examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own
selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you,
except ye be reprobates?" (2 Cor. 13:5).
And that brings me back to the proper
response which a minister, or Christian leader, should make to the
Manhattan Declaration. This could not be more important, given our
responsibility as summed up in Acts 20:28 relative to false teachers:
"Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the
which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God,
which he hath purchased with his own blood."
Now, it is a self-evident truth that
the tenor and substance of our words are critical with regard to such an
open assault upon the righteousness of God and the purity of His church.
If our response to those who "pervert the right ways of the
Lord" (Acts 13:10) is limited to a low-key explanation of why we
demurred to sign the Manhattan Declaration and expressing
that we are "troubled" by parts or all of it, then I believe we
have fallen far short and even desensitized others to the grievous error
and danger—even wickedness—of what the Manhattan Declaration
evangelicals have done. I would ask those Christian ministers and leaders
who take such an approach if they would respond in a like manner if they
had just been grievously slandered and their own wives had just been
solicited for prostitution by the MD evangelicals. It is a fit analogy but
which even falls far short, as analogies do by nature, when considering
the outrage which has been committed against the Lord Jesus and His bride,
the church.
Our good Shepherd and Bishop of our
souls did not so lightly deal with those who sought to lead His sheep into
grievous heresy. The Apostles and first pastors of the New Testament
church surely did not content themselves with mildly pointing out
soul-damning error and respectfully distancing themselves from
church-corrupting wolves. Certainly, the word of God does not teach
ministers of the Lord's church to confront such men and women by, well,
not confronting them but rather only making an essential, polite
distinction between error and truth. It seems to me that to do so is
to be half faithful, so to speak. When men rise up from within the
evangelical church and publicly declare and support a false gospel and
call the antichristian church Christian, they must be confronted, rebuked,
and called to repentance by faithful ministers and those who hold
positions of influence among the church. I will dare to say that there is
no greater danger to the church and no greater affront to the glory and
honor of our Lord Jesus Christ than gospel-perverting teachers within her.
In the case at hand, it should be
without controversy that elders, including ministers, have a
responsibility to frame the issue properly with language that conveys the
magnitude and danger of the sin. Concerning the Cretians who were
"teaching things which they ought not" (Titus 1:11), Paul
instructs Titus, "Wherefore rebuke them sharply, that they may be
sound in the faith" (Titus 1:13). Certainly, the gross error the
MD evangelicals have passed off as truth and the contempt they have shown
for Christ Jesus has been committed before the whole world. So they ought
to be sharply rebuked by faithful ministers, and that before the whole
church. "Them that sin rebuke before all, that others also may
fear" (1 Tim. 5:20). Christians, especially the shepherds of Christ's
flock, are commanded to "earnestly contend for the faith which was once
delivered unto the saints" (Jude 1:3). The meaning of
"contend" in the context is "to struggle" against
those within the church who pervert the faith of the gospel. This is a
critical moment in the history of the church. This is a time for both
ministers and their people to consider if their response to the Manhattan
Declaration evangelicals would qualify as "striving together for the
faith of the gospel" (Phil. 1:27).
But the point that I am making is so
obvious that it seems almost an insult to the discerning Christian reader
to belabor it. The command and example of the Scriptures ordain that the
MD evangelicals must be confronted, what they have done must be condemned,
and they must be called to repent of this grievous, very public sin
against the Lord Jesus Christ. The love of Christ constrains us to that
course of action. And anything less than that will advance the cause of
infidelity and the antichristian church. If I am wrong in what I have
written, I genuinely invite those who think so to please show me by the
Scriptures my error.
A Short
Statement in Response to the Manhattan Declaration
|